MARDEN COMMUNITY PLAN

 

ACTION PLAN

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Version 1(2)

25/03/2007 09:46

 


MARDEN COMMUNITY PLAN:

 

ACTION PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

What is a Community Plan?

 

Community action plans are a means for local communities to review their facilities, services and needs and develop an action plan to improve them. 

In April 2004 the South East England Development Agency launched a Programme to regenerate ‘Market Towns’. Even though Marden has not been a market town since before the First World War, we still come under the SEEDA’s definition for one as we have a population across the whole area of over 4,000 people!  

To qualify for grant funding of up to £40k, or exceptionally £240k, such towns and larger villages have to undertake what is known as a Market Town Healthcheck. Key to this is the establishment of a partnership involving the Parish Council, people who live and work in the village, local businesses, voluntary and community organisations.  

How such a grant, which has to be matched by local funding that we have raised from within the community, may be used is, of course, the end result of the exercise.

 

How we did it 

The plan was undertaken under a formal constitution and managed as a project.  Our main aims are;  

·         To work together to create a potential future policy and action plan, to be known as the Marden Community Plan (MCP), arising from the Healthcheck consultation process.

·         To endeavour to implement the agreed Community Plan arising from the Healthcheck consultation process.

·         To work together on issues of interest and concern to Marden and its surrounding communities in order to secure its long term viability as a centre for social, business, and cultural activities to maintain its particular character and heritage.
 

As above, the Marden Community Plan is compiled to a Market Towns Healthcheck format as defined by the Countryside Agency.  This has meant that all the data collected and compiled is analysed according to four main ‘Workstream’ headings:

MCP has set up four Workstream groups, one for each of these headings.  

These groups were all led by volunteers.  Regular meetings were held to discuss progress, outstanding tasks and any potential difficulties. 

The format of the questions under the Healthcheck system is comprehensive but also proscribed.  This means that, in some cases, a few questions were inappropriate to Marden due, in the main, to the size of our population and administrative status (i.e. a parish).  In other areas, we felt that the questions did not probe deeply enough or were too generic for our needs.  We needed greater definition to the concerns and issues of people who live, work and play in the Village. 

We therefore held three open days, partly to inform people and businesses as to what the Community Plan was all about, but also to gather additional information that would give more detailed and focussed pictures of the current situation and future requirements and expectations.   

Although the Healthcheck is organised into the four themes already mentioned it will be obvious that these do not stand alone or in isolation – transport and traffic issues will frequently affect the environment through noise, pollution and quality of life aspects for example, but also economically in terms of people’s ability to get to their place of employment and businesses’ ability to distribute their produce. Likewise there will be social and community considerations, especially in a rural community, regarding the provision of public transport and accessibility to main services not available locally. 

For this reason, action plan items are not grouped by topic but solely by the fact that they have been identified as important to the future needs of Marden.  However, in order to help clarify how these actions have been arrived at, the findings have been presented under the original four Healthcheck headings in the next section.

 A full version of the plan, including all questionnaire responses etc, is available on request (it runs to over 150 pages!) and will be available electronically at www.marden.org.uk. 

Suffice to say, the plan could not have been completed without the considerable efforts of the workstream groups and the many others who contributed to, or provided, information.   Detailed acknowledgement can be found in the annexes to the full report.

 

What we’ve found out 

i) Economy 

The main issues in this area are:

 

It became obvious that the many local businesses in Marden have only a slight knowledge of what other businesses exist in the village or what they do.  At present, there are missed opportunities for improving the local economy and increasing sustainability by sharing of expertise, using local suppliers rather than going further afield or developing a local customer base, all of which contribute to transport and environment issues as well as economy, reducing, for example, ‘food miles’ or distances travelled to work as well as answering ‘community’ issues of creating more employment opportunity through potential business growth.

.  

One way of improving this situation would be through the setting up of a Marden business forum, meeting regularly to discuss issues and concerns of the local business community.  MCP or the Parish Council could act as facilitators, secretariat, or provide a conduit between the forum and appropriate local or national Government or statutory authority for the issue in hand.

Another, larger, project would be a comprehensive business directory linked to a more frequent and greatly expanded parish newsletter. Allied to this would be a ‘local food directory’ a project that would also have both environmental and transport issues. These are discussed further in the following sections.

 

Both these actions, as mentioned, could lead to an increase in the number of jobs available locally as well as increasing their occupational range.  Many local residents who currently commute to work, whether within Kent or to London would welcome the chance to work locally.

 

Any increase in jobs needs to be matched with people with suitable skills available to fill the vacancies created.  A strong message from local businesses is that providing generic training facilities would be a major asset.   IT training is an obvious requirement, but, also, fork lift truck driving and materials handling; and Health and Safety legislative knowledge were mentioned.

 

More fundamental knowledge, the current buzz-word is ‘life skills’, was also raised as being lacking in many job applicants.   These basic skills include communications (sometimes as basic as how to talk to others or answer the phone in a business environment); literacy and numeracy.

 

A significant contribution to the local economy is made by part-time workers.  Ensuring that maximum use can be made of this resource requires flexibility from both employers and employees but also local authority.  More child-care facilities are identified as one area where local authorities could help this process.

 

A re-developed and expanded Memorial Hall could provide a venue for many of the above actions as well as providing conference, meeting, and training facilities for communities outside our hinterland to give an additional source of income both for the Hall and as a spin-off, other businesses in Marden.

 

These last requirements are as much a social need as an economic one and are discussed further in that section.

 

Recent months have seen two significant developments in the Industrial Estate: the opening of Boddington’s plastic injection moulding factory at Wheelbarrow Park Estate and the approval of Claygate’s planning permission for a major warehousing and distribution centre.  A number of additional jobs will be created and both companies are committed to the village.   Tomkinson’s are also applying for permission to develop their facility.

 

In the interests of a continued, sustainable economy, further expansion and development of the Industrial Estate, within its current limits (if feasible), should be welcomed, though a range of environmental issues such as traffic, noise and general ‘quality of life’ for local people as well as waste management must be taken into account for any development.  

More also needs to be done by local authorities to ensure Marden businesses, established and potential, are aware of the various grants and initiatives available for business start-up, expansion, and sustainability. 

As well as taking advantage of such financial benefits, marketing and publicity is, naturally, vital to the success of any business.  Nowadays this is virtually impossible without the Internet.  A number of responses to the workstream questionnaires indicated the poor, or at least inconsistent, broadband access (I can vouch for this personally –Ed).  BT needs to be lobbied by the Parish Council to increase both the speed and the quality of service for Marden. 

Shops and shopping have long been an issue for Marden and a number of shops have closed over the years to be converted to private houses.  This is not a trend, with the best will in the world, we are likely to reverse.  We can, however, try to ensure what we have we hold.   Making retailers aware of grants and initiatives available, as above, is one way.  Promoting them through a local directory, and the website, also proposed in the action plan, is another.   Retailer’s perception of trying to negate unfair competition – for example free buses to Supermarkets – a third.  

Tourism to the area figures quite significantly in the local economy.  There is a large and popular camping and caravan site to the south of the Village and a number of residents offer B&B.  We need to ensure that tourists spend money whilst they are here!  Things that may help them do this are adequate car parking (currently being resolved by the Parish and Borough Councils);  a visitor’s guide to local shops, services, attractions and facilities (an updated version is currently in preparation by the Marden Society); and adequate public transport for those who do not have their own vehicle. 

A Heritage Centre would also encourage people to visit the centre, hopefully using other local shops and pubs whilst they were here. 

Transport and public transport in particular, is an issue affecting many aspects of current and future of Marden.   But in the context of employment it is essential we have bus and train services timetabled to meet the need of those who both live and work here to get to and from their place of employment and to reach training courses, etc.  

 

Both train and bus companies need to be lobbied vigorously by the Parish Council to ensure our services are improved to meet our needs, especially during the evenings when a ‘one an hour’ train service after 19.00 hrs is unacceptable as many local residents are still commuting home from work well after that time.

 

ii) Environment 

Environmental issues can be grouped into 3 main sections:

There is a further set of issues, identified at the Open Days, outside the immediate control or resolution within the village that could be resolved by the Parish Council or others taking on a lobbying role.

 

Taking first the current size of the village and planning matters generally, praise for the existing situation (perfect size, compactness and general pleasantness) –clearly outweighed adverse comments on over-development. The comments seeking to restrict development should be accommodated by the formal planning process.

 

As has been noted elsewhere, Marden’s history, heritage and culture figured strongly in people’s responses, all positively. This interest and the need for continuing preservation is at the heart of the Marden Society History Group request for support with plans for a local heritage centre.

 

Comments relating to open space in the village were conflicting, but it is a fact that although Marden’s open spaces are generally considered to be attractive and well maintained by 97% of respondents they are smaller in total than in other rural areas of Maidstone Borough

 

Looking at the area outside of the village centre itself, specific comments appreciating the surrounding countryside were the most frequent notes with no adverse remarks.  From the landscape questionnaires the rural nature of the landscape was highly valued, especially orchards and hop gardens, together with old farm buildings and water features, ponds, etc.  Woodlands, hedges and windbreaks were also valued.

 

Moving to quality of life issues, there were a number of positive comments on the peace and quiet of the village, one that for some has no major problems, is unspoilt and, pleasant.  However, the issues relating to speeding, heavy lorries and anti-social behaviour, detailed elsewhere, may rock this apparent rural idyll.  It should be remembered that the situation which is peace and quiet to some may be boring to others, for example from a younger age group (see Social and Community).  There are no major pollution issues relating to water, or air quality or noise and vibration in comparison with national standards, but the transport issues referred to above must not be forgotten, especially for those living on the main through routes and in Pattenden Lane.

 

More detailed comments on certain aspects of the village included a number of strong criticisms of the appearance of the village around the Church Green area, especially the Butcher’s shop, but on the plus site, there was praise for such things as the flower troughs in the High Street and the well-conserved older buildings in the village centre.

 

The issue of locally produced food figures in all of the Healthcheck categories and in the Environment category, the support for ‘food grown and sold locally’ was highest scored of the nine options respondents chose as future needs. The comment ‘local foodstuffs are excellent’ was recorded in the General questionnaire together with several supporting local shops.   The issues of ‘food miles’ and traceability are currently rising in national awareness and there are a number of initiatives that could be pursued

 

Walking in Marden, both as a means of ‘transport’ and for leisure attracted a number of comments, good and bad.  These included requests for clearing the footpaths to the play area and general footpath maintenance. There were individual comments suggesting the encouragement of more walking as an alternative to driving to destinations.  Amongst improvements that may encourage more people to walk are: less inconsiderate parking, better pavement maintenance and sweeping, no dog fouling, better street lighting, and less litter.

 

The questionnaire on the future of Marden, as respondents would like to see it, identified a number of potential actions and issues for the future and drew positive indications of support.  Three quarters of those who completed the questionnaire said they would actively support, in the community, all of the nine given topics. Each individual topic was supported by over two-thirds of the respondents.  The most popular were local food, sustainable employment, nature conservation, waste management and sustainable building materials.  However, the most urgent, after food and employment, were said to be waste management, planning for climate change and energy conservation and efficiency in community activities.

 

Any of these topics could be taken as a basis for future action and it is suggested that a feasibility study be carried out of the potential opportunities for the use of locally grown materials to produce energy for local industry and domestic use. Local energy supply is identified in the target of Sustainable Prosperity for the SEEDA Regional Economic Strategy 2006-2016. It would re-strengthen village/country links and could encourage sustainable economic growth.

 

Last, in this section, there were a number of other issues that need support or action by persons or authorities outside the remit of the Parish Council.  These include the improvements to current re-cycling arrangements; better signage (see also ‘Transport’); fly-tipping and litter problems; siting of mobile phone masts, which should be outside the village residential areas; and greater safety of the ponds behind the playing field.

 

 

iii) Social and Community 

The major issues identified in this area are: 

Related to these, the community requires local venues for meetings, events and functions that are accessible, affordable, and secure and serve the requirements of 21st century users in terms of facilities and equipment.

 

The Memorial Hall is the major venue and much work has been carried out in recent years to improve the premises, but much more could be done to enhance the Hall that would in so doing address the Community and Social issues mentioned.   

As well as answering the needs of the general community, the development of the Hall, including major structural improvements, would also help address the needs of the business community as regards meeting and conference facilities; as well as providing training rooms and possibly equipment.   

The need for a youth club and improved youth facilities generally, was strongly identified both through the workstream questionnaires and the open days.  The Memorial Hall could provide this too, on a regular and permanent basis, if facilities were improved.   The running of such a facility is, obviously a separate issue, but one that may well be much easier to resolve if the premises were there. 

Allied to youth issues, the need for ‘Life skills’ training was also raised.  This type of training would not only benefit the youth of the village themselves (or other disadvantaged people of any age) but would also help the local economy and was similarly raised by local business community (c.f. Economy section above).  Again, this could be held in an improved Memorial Hall. 

Some of the skills required, such as numeracy and literacy could be honed by greater liaison with local schools, especially at secondary level.  A Business Forum could develop this link with the potential for developing job-specific or technical modules for scholars during their last few months of formal education if a job-offer was guaranteed. 

There was also mention, in a number of responses, of the need to improve other meeting facilities and venues in Marden.  Luck’s Way and Cherry Orchard play areas are both thought to be in need of upgrading and maintenance, as is the Scout HQ; however the status of these venues in terms of availability to the general public would need to be clarified. 

Although some playgroup facilities are currently available, these are either pre-school (mornings) or only in the summer holidays for older children.  There is a need for all day childcare, especially for younger children or during all school breaks.  Again, this links to local economy issues and would enable parents who currently have to work restricted hours to be more flexible and attractive to local employers. 

The issue of affordable housing is a national one that is particularly acute in the South-East of England; Marden is no exception and the Parish Council are already working with Maidstone Borough to develop an affordable housing scheme and to identify suitable land that may be available.  Interestingly, only one Open Day respondent noted this issue as a potential problem for the village, though a previous survey had identified this as a major issue). 

Crime and fear of crime is a major issue for many in the area.  In ‘central’ Marden there is considerable concern about vandalism, damage to cars and property, threatening and generally anti-social behaviour.  Several responses, not just from the elderly, feel the village is unsafe at night.  The Playing Field and adjacent orchards; around the Railway Station and Chantry Road and Pattenden Lane/ West End junctions were singled out for mention. 

In more rural areas of Marden, farmers and landowners complain of theft of equipment and machinery and, again, damage to fences and property. 

The rural policing issue is well known but despite strenuous efforts by the Parish Council over the years remains largely unsolved.  The appointment of Community Wardens appeared to be a solution but they never seem to stay long in post!    There is an urgent need to ensure Marden has the police cover it needs by lobbying Borough and County Councillors. 

Whilst the Parish Council have attempted to tackle this, and many other community problems, the public awareness of what  the Council and other organisations are doing to improve matters is not as good as it should and needs to be. 

This links to an overall issue of improving communications and information.   

The Parish Council produces a quarterly newsletter, theoretically delivered to every house in the parish and yet 25% of respondents say they are unaware of it.   

Likewise, as has already been mentioned in the Economy section, discussions at the business open day revealed that companies in Marden have little or no awareness of other producers, suppliers, retailing or support businesses locally. 

There are currently a number of sources of information, both hard copy and electronic, but no single publication or website that meets everyone’s needs.  It is, perhaps, businesses that are the least well served.

 

Consideration should therefore be given to:

 

i) Producing a directory of Marden businesses, giving details of products and services (and obviously contact names, addresses and phone numbers and/or websites) that could be circulated to all households and businesses in the Village. It would need to be periodically updated – perhaps twice a year and would also be available electronically.

ii) Developing local communication media by increasing the frequency of the Parish Newsletter, currently quarterly, to bi-monthly or monthly depending on resources available.  It would be professionally produced and edited and distributed by a commercial company to all households and business locally as well as published electronically. 

 

As well as Parish Council information, (and Borough and KCC data relevant to Marden), it would carry details of all forthcoming events in the village and could also include, for example: situations vacant; launches of new products or services by local firms; meetings of local clubs and organisations; train and bus information; and updates of progress towards meeting the actions from this Plan!

 

As well as increasing public knowledge of what’s going on, such a publication could increase people’s awareness of the system of local Government and the political system generally at Village and community level.  Several people mentioned this lack of awareness as an issue for them.

 

The sports and leisure activities available are a vital part of the social aspect of any community.  Marden is pretty well served here but never-the-less a number of potential actions have been identified.

 

The Marden Festival held in 2002 was rightly popular and hugely successful in bringing the community together.  Another event would be much welcomed if volunteers could be found to organise and run the event.  Similarly, guided walks around the countryside on public footpaths are requested by a number of people.  Organising volunteers are again needed, though the Walking Group have recently initiated such events.

 

Other improvements to sports and leisure facilities noted in responses were improvements to tennis courts in Albion Road and to car parking facilities at the Marden Minors ground on the Industrial Estate.

 

More sensitive issues that need to be resolved, presumably led by the Parish Council, are the parking of cars when  the Bowls Club are ‘at home’ and noise an nuisance to Stanley and Albion Road residents from the Russett’s Cricket and Hockey club as well as from youths on that ground when the club is unoccupied.  Damage to cars has also been reported.

 

Preserving Marden’s culture and heritage for future generations is also an issue for many.  The Marden Society History Group has been very active in this area and has held a number of exhibitions showing the history of the village, as well as researching various aspects of our history; developing a detailed and comprehensive website, and been involved in preserving various artefacts and structures.

 

They have acquired a vast amount of information mainly, but not exclusively, written or photographic and now need a secure environment where it can be stored and displayed to the public.  A Heritage Centre could be established, either at the rear of the Public Library (discussions on this are currently taking place) or in the Memorial Hall. 

We also have a number of pieces of historic street furniture still in situ, including milestones and finger posts.  Until recently the telephone boxes were of the old red type and a number of open day respondents asked that the new glass one in the High Street revert to this original type, as has happened in other Conservation Areas around the country. 

iv) Transport and Accessibility

 There are 4 main subjects for action in this section:

 

As has been emphasised throughout this document, many of the issues and actions are inter-dependent on each other and those in the Transport workstream are no exception.   All who live, work and play in the village need transport, whether car, train, bus or the humble bicycle to get to work; for shopping; to visit friends and family; to reach important services such as the Medical Centre or the dentist’s surgery. 

 

 When it comes to leisure, transport and accessibility issues can take on significance: that of being used as a form of recreation in their own right, cycling and walking in the countryside whether on (as appropriate) cycle ways, quiet lanes, bridleways and footpaths.  The use of bikes and ‘Shank’s Pony’  can also have environmental ( and health) advantages, though there have been complaints in the past (and on the Grumpy Board) of cycling clubs, who use the village as a base for road racing events, being unmindful and inconsiderate to other road users and residents.  Never-the-less, there is much scope for improving the facilities for both cyclists and walkers throughout the Parish. 

 

Virtually all the proposed actions in the Transport and Accessibility section will be the responsibility of higher authority at Borough or County Council level, or public transport service providers to implement.  However, the Marden Parish Council has a vital and on-going role to play: that of lobbying these organisations and/or their officials’ political representatives to ensure they are so implemented.  None of the actions will happen without the Parish Council’s impetus and persistence.

 

It may be appropriate to set up a Marden transport users’ group if volunteers to run such an organisation could be found.

 

Highways issues have been a major concern for Marden for a number of years.  This concern has a number of aspects, chiefly: traffic calming; road signage and excessive heavy goods vehicle traffic.

 

A comprehensive consultation over traffic and highways issues has recently taken place, initiated and led by Cllr. Richard Adam, with the support of Marden Parish Council.   A number of public meetings were held resulting in a number of recommendations and proposals that were subsequently adopted in full, or in part, by the local highways authority.   Their implementation was afterwards suspended or postponed following a petition from people who objected to some aspects of the proposals.

 

A few of the recommendations have at least been commenced, namely: improved signage for heavy lorries (HGVs) approaching Marden from the Maidstone direction and going to the Industrial Estate so that they avoid the village centre and the low bridge in Pattenden Lane; and extending the 30 mph speed limit past the cemetery.    Much needs to be done, though, and proposed actions include further traffic calming in the centre of the village, especially at the Pattenden Lane/ West End junction and by the Post Office, extending speed restrictions on village approaches and additional signing improvements to the various business and industrial sites.  

 

The Parish Council continues to push for  the non-controversial aspects to be carried out and for further design work to continue to address the Pattenden Lane/ West End Junction issues.

 

The movement of HGVs is a problem throughout the area.  Lorries are becoming increasingly larger and heavier and totally unsuitable for country lanes and roads built for the horse and cart and poorly maintained.   Yet lorries need to use these lanes as, as well as farms, there are many other businesses located in rural areas.  These businesses all contribute to the local economy but the vehicle movements to and from them create major environmental problems.  There is a need to restrict lorry movements to suitable routes and define a ‘Quiet Lanes’ network, a scheme already in consultation.  The Parish Council will need, as mentioned above, to continue to support this initiative and lobby Borough and County Council members accordingly.

 

Whilst restricting large lorries, whether by better signage or legal exclusion may partly help, some will perforce need to access the village centre to deliver goods and supplies.  A large wagon trying to negotiate through the High Street, or by the Primary School at the start and finish of the school day, will frequently cause traffic jams because of inappropriately (and thoughtlessly) parked cars.  Train commuters who are unwilling to pay the station car parking charges and use, instead, unrestricted roads in Marden to leave their cars also add to the problem.

 

Lastly in this section, speeding through the hamlet of Chainhurst is a problem and needs to be tackled by introducing speed limits there and subsequent enforcement.

 

Car Parking is, therefore, a major problem. The Parish Council are currently working with Maidstone Borough Council (who own the village car park behind the Library) to implement a solution that will be fair and reasonable to everyone; the economic well-being of local shops a significant consideration.  Punitive restrictions could drive customers away (literally!) and residents and businesses alike naturally wish to park as close as possible to their own premises.  Yet, questionnaire and open day feedback indicates a need for improved, more frequent train services, something that will not be achieved if passenger – commuter - numbers fall.

 

The Police also have a role to play in ensuring parking restrictions are enforced, including the illegal parking of cars on pavements, a situation that occurs ad nauseum especially outside the Tandoori restaurant and around the West End.

 

Bus services to Marden are limited to those that start and/or finish in Maidstone, though the routes and times taken to achieve that destination vary.  The services run roughly every 2 hours or so.  There is no service on Sundays, nor on any evening after 17.30 from Maidstone or 19.00 hours going there.  Responses indicate the need for a much improved service that would allow more access to both employment and entertainment.  Young people would especially benefit from this.

 

A lot of effort has gone on over the years to improve Marden’s train services but equally there remains scope for improvement. The two main areas of concern are the train services themselves and, second, customer service issues.  Trains need to be more frequent, especially in the evenings.  At present, services are reduced to one an hour after 19.00 hours, a daft situation when many commuters are still home-bound.  Modern work ethics mean that the ‘rush-hour’ is still evident until much later.  A better evening service would also improve local’s ability to reach leisure activities in towns on the rail route as well as London.  Worksheet responses and the open day also reveal a need for improved connections at Paddock Wood to the Maidstone West line.  Currently, Marden travellers have to wait nearly an hour for a connection for want of a few minutes re-scheduling.

 

Customer service at Marden has come in for considerable and justified criticism over recent years and many letters written by both the Parish Council and individuals to the Train Operating Company (TOC), so far to no avail.  These complaints involve both the infrastructure of the station and the customer service received from station staff.

 

The station needs improved passenger shelters and seating as well as improved (or even fully functioning!) train information and clocks.  People with mobility restrictions need improved access to the ‘down side’ platform (i.e. towards Ashford).  As already inferred above, the cost of parking at the station is considered by many to be excessive and South Eastern, its franchised car park operators, Meteor Parking plc, need to be pressurised to review what may be done.

 

In staffing the station, responses show a need for longer opening of the booking office.  As well as improving the service generally, this could help increase revenue by reducing ‘fare-dodgers’ as well as improving security and passenger well-being.  A more sensitive and subjective problem is that of the TOC providing helpful, informative and courteous staff at the station, not always the case at present.

 

 

 

 

Proposed actions

 

A list of the proposed actions, based on the findings of the Healthcheck, evidence from the questionnaires and Open Day feedback, as summarised above, follows. 

 

They are shown in 3 groups:

Group A: those that will require considerable time and resource, both financial and in terms of people’s time and commitment to resolve.  A number of these will not be resolvable completely from within Marden, but will be up to the village, to initiate, lead and manage.  The main point is that they are considered highly important in meeting the future needs of Marden and its surrounding area;

Group B that will be less costly in resource terms, could be resolved fairly quickly and simply, or can be taken forward in conjunction with other, larger, projects. These issues will not always be mentioned specifically in the foregoing text but their link to a major item will, hopefully, be obvious; and

Group C: Lobbying Items that cannot be resolved locally or by direct action from within the community, whether by the Parish Council or others, but where it is considered that the Council has a vital role to play in lobbying those responsible, e.g. Borough and County Councils or public transport operators, for the required improvements.

 

The items have not been ranked in order of importance and priorities will be determined by consultation. 

 

An indication of who may take responsibility for leading the action is suggested for discussion in the second column.

 

Annex 4 of the full action plan carries more detail on these proposed actions.

 

 

Group A

 

Item

Lead Responsibility

Maintaining good local employment opportunities by promoting benefits of village and ensuring potential employers are aware of grants and incentives.

Local authorities and local businesses

Initiate and develop local business support e.g.  local business forum or Chamber of Trade; small business service

Local businesses/ MCP to facilitate

Major development and refurbishment of the Memorial  Hall, including re-roofing, expanding public rooms and car park in order to develop meeting, conference and training facilities available locally

Memorial Hall Management committee/ Parish Council

Ensure adequate vocational training is available for local residents and employees, including training to ensure potential employees have sufficient numeracy and literacy skills to meet employer’s requirements and possibly  setting up local IT and e-business training facilities (possibly in Memorial Hall). This also links to the need to ensure the provision of adequate generic skills appropriate to local employment needs, including the provision of local facilities for generic skills training as well as Local ‘life skills’ training facilities for young people.

Local businesses/local education authority/ Parish Council/ Memorial Hall Management committee

Support the recognition of the importance of historical and cultural heritage for example by seeking financial support for a village heritage centre.

Marden Society History Group/ Marden Society

Support the enhancement of and increase in public open spaces, nature conservation designated areas, and areas of valued landscape.

Marden PC/ Borough Council/ conservation groups

Ensuring continued viability of local shops etc that could include promotion and publicity for local businesses, production of local food directory and village guides (the latter is already in hand). Shops should also encouraged to review opening times, especially on Saturdays to prevent  village becoming commuter/ dormitory only

Local businesses supported by Parish Council and grants and initiatives available through KCC and national Government bodies

Improve car parking facilities, including changing library car park restriction (N.B this is in hand); disabled parking in the High Street

Marden PC/ Maidstone Borough

Improvements to communication of matters of interest to the community, both from the Parish Council and other local authorities as well as businesses, voluntary organisations and clubs and societies (e.g. by producing regular business directory, set up Business forum and develop regular parish news letter). The Parish Council Quarterly Newsletter awareness needs to improve

Parish Council/ MCP to facilitate

Address problems of dogs, litter and vandalism on playing field and anti-social behaviour and vandalism generally throughout the village (see also below)

Kent Police/ Community Warden

Loitering/noise at night/motorbikes in orchard behind playing field. Anti-social behaviour/threats.

Action on crime, vandalism, litter (cf. other comments above).

Kent Police/ Community Warden

More youth activities/facilities required including permanent youth club, especially for those of secondary school age

 

More affordable housing

Parish and Borough Councils/ housing associations

Carry out a review of the opportunities to encourage walking and cycling for journeys to reduce the impact of the private car on the village.  This could also include

improved facilities for the disadvantaged (young/ old/ disabled) on foot or in wheelchairs/ pushchairs and for local cyclists.

MCP to facilitate

Review the feasibility of producing sustainable local energy for efficient local use

MCP to facilitate with local businesses

 

 

Group B

 

Item

Lead Responsibility

Develop childcare facilities to assist in enabling parents to undertake employment, vocational training, plus Childcare facilities for afternoons and holidays

Local businesses/ Parish Council/ Primary School

Ensure adequate access to internet is available through offices to the public

KCC Library Services/ Parish Council/ Memorial Hall?

Consider the conservation of the individual character of Marden village and any opportunity for central village features.

Marden Society/ History Group

Address the perceived eyesores and encourage the retention of the attractive, peaceful situation through the local planning process.

Parish Council planning committee/ Borough Council planning dept.

Review the opportunities to encourage and assist. The mutual support of local food producers, retailers and consumers.

MCP to facilitate / local businesses

Develop links between school learning and further (continuing) learning

Local education authority/ employers

Encourage future changes in the use of the surrounding country which respect the overall landscape interest and value, whilst contributing to the economic and amenity benefit of the Parish as a whole

Parish Council planning committee/ Borough Council planning dept.

Cherry Orchard play area needs maintenance.

Developer/Parish Council

Lucks Way play area needs equipment.

Borough and Parish Council

Marden Minors field needs proper parking area.

Landowner/  Parish Council

Scout Headquarters needs updating & maintenance.

Scouts

Tennis Club - courts need improvement.

Tennis Club

Memorial Hall and Vestry Hall hire charges considered too high and needing review

Memorial Hall/ Vestry Hall committees

Parking problems caused by Bowls Club visiting teams.

Bowls Club

Hockey Club – perceived difficult attitude to neighbours and damage caused to cars.

Cricket Hockey Club

Reinstate Marden Festival.  Also revive/incorporate Carnival, Fête, Picnic-in-Park, Saints v Sinners

All the Community

New community events etc ideas:

- organised footpath walks

- Farmers Market

 

Walker’s Group

 

Red telephone box for village centre.

History Group

Improved awareness of political procedures (also linked to communications issues)

Parish Council/ MCP to facilitate

Tackle pavement parking in problem areas

Kent Police

Review the current sustainability agenda for the future of Marden and enhance as necessary

Parish Council/ MCP to facilitate

 

 

Group C

 

Item

Lead Responsibility

Encourage active involvement in the current changes to the local planning processes to ensure future development proposals take account of the community views and are beneficial to the Parish.

Parish Council

Maidstone Borough Council

 

Ensure adequate high sped internet access is available throughout the village and hinterland

British Telecom

Ensure adequate public transport is available to enable people undertaking vocational training outside of Marden to attend courses (linked to Transport issues)

KCC, South Eastern, local bus companies

Encourage appropriate staff development, appraisal, better retention rates in local workforce

Local businesses

Comprehensive traffic calming scheme, including lower speed limits on village approaches and HGV signing improvements

Kent Highway Services

Introduce speed limit through Chainhurst

Kent Highway Services

Restrict HGVs to suitable routes and define quiet lanes network

Kent Highway Services/ TRAMP

Enforce existing yellow lines

Maidstone Borough Council

More frequent bus services during the day and provide evening and Sunday services

KCC / Arriva / Nu-Venture

More frequent train services, especially in the evening

Southeastern

Better connections at Paddock Wood

Southeastern

Improved platform shelters and seating

Southeastern

Improve accessibility to/from down-line platform

Southeastern

Increase ticket office opening hours

Southeastern

Provide better customer service

Southeastern

Reduce cost of station car park

Southeastern / Meteor Parking

Improvements to local and national Waste management policies for both business and domestic users.

Local businesses

 

 

 

 

 

What Next?

 

The draft plan is being sent to the Parish Council asking them to comment by 31st March 2007.  At the same time, they are asked to prioritise, if possible, the actions in Groups A-C as they se their importance to the future needs of Marden.  Copies of this draft are also being sent to our Borough and County councillors and to Action for Communities in Rural Kent.

 

A final version of the plan will then be issued  and an Open Day held to promote the Plan and its actions and to gather comments and views of the whole community.

 

Once this plan has been accepted, primarily by the Marden Parish Council, our main sponsors who commissioned it, then action towards the implementation of some or all of the entire proposed action plan can begin.

 

This implementation is not the responsibility of the Marden Community Plan group. Their responsibility is to monitor the progress of any implemented proposal against the plan; to facilitate and/or liaise between people or organisations; and to identify how to ensure effective achievement of the action plans.  This could include helping to identify sources of funding for projects or best practice management techniques, or networking with other communities to share experiences of similar situations.

 

                                                                             Graham Tippen  
  
                                                     Project Co-ordinator

                                                                                                March 2007